On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 13:22:01 -0600, "Ed Covney"
<ed(dot)covney(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>Paul Maudib wrote:
>
>> What does this have to do with the OS? NOTHING. It is purely
>> hardware related and since it does not involve XP does NOT belong
>> here.
>>
>> Ask elsewhere
>
>Farad'n (aka Paul Thoroughgood, aka Maudib) -

You've missed several:
NoneofYourBusiness
NoConseqence
PaulMaudib
LetoII
Farad'n

Be more thorough it you want to try and bait me.

>I see your signiture changed, but not your message. By the way,
>if you really want a make-over (a new signiture) you must change
>ISPs and the electronic path to this board (Although Australians
>are at a big disadvantage in that respect). And if you keep the
>old ISP as well, you can pretend to be two people; each greatly
>appreciating the wise words of the other. What genius!

Australian? I'm not from Australia. Or maybe I am. It doesn't
matter. I post through a news server that strips headers and IP
addresses, and what I post is the truth whether you like it or not.

>For a 42 year old who outta know better, you can change your
>signitiure a million times, it won't matter. If all you can offer is
>"does NOT belong here", it's the message that we don't need.

No, it's a message you don't want to HEAR, which is the ugly truth.

>By the way Paul, are you still slummin' in Taigum?

No.

SATA, I've found, can do copies faster on a 2nd identical hard drive rather
than the one windows is run on.
ATA/ide, doesn't make any difference if using identical hard drives. Again,
a slave can affect the performance of the master on the same cable. See my
prior reply (which you deleted in the past reply) for other concerns.
--
Dave

"New Orleans Novice" <ReadingLearningWriting@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:eeOAXrzlIHA.1052@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>I thought maybe 1 HD for C:\ the OS and a 2nd HD for D:\ the VIdeo DATA
>files.
>
> The 2nd idea of a 2nd Data cable IF it worked on a 2nd HD for more speed
> and/or reliability while runing heavy duty Multi Media video, etc.
>
> If there is a 2nd HD will one DATA cable be faster as it only has so much
> band width? Or with 2 HD's is it more reliable with the OS and programs
> running from the C:\ Drive and the Video DATA files located on the 2nd D:\
> Drive?
>
> Thanks for your help and tips ; LsuEdu @ New Orleans Louisiana
>

> I post through a news server that strips headers and IP
> addresses, and what I post is the truth whether you like it or not.

A troll, a coward, and a liar all at the same time.

"Farad'n" <none@none.net> wrote in message
news:atriv3t01g3baqu45senu93sccrnjjjdq9@4ax.com...
>
> Australian? I'm not from Australia. Or maybe I am. It doesn't
> matter. I post through a news server that strips headers and IP
> addresses, and what I post is the truth whether you like it or not.

San Diego State University and Global Crossing in Pheonix Arizona have both
been notified.



--


Brian A. Sesko { MS MVP_Windows Desktop User Experience }
Conflicts start where information lacks.
http://basconotw.mvps.org/

Suggested posting do's/don'ts: http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
How to ask a question: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375

I have your previous reply saved. If I buy a new RIG maybe it will have PCI
X and / or SCSI.

This PC only has PCI and 2 IDE channels on the MB so on a test the 2nd DATA
cable will be removed from the CDROM and connected to a 2nd HD used for DATA
only just to test if it will work and boot up.

Someone sent this link which was very informative;
Sent by PAUL:
This is a long read, but you'll be a better person if you finish it.

http://www.pcguide.com/ref/hdd/if/ide/conf.htm

The best data cables, are the ones with 80 wires (thinner wire).

How can you tell where the troll sent it from?

From: Farad'n <none@none.net>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware
Subject: Re: speed and reliability of the CPU and the DATA cable
Message-ID: <atriv3t01g3baqu45senu93sccrnjjjdq9@4ax.com>
References: <eX#Rg7ylIHA.1912@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>
<bqdgv35nhhg6ugr2a2veaanphpkukj2kr4@4ax.com>
<enmUCuBmIHA.4480@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 42
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
properly.
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 20:52:06 EDT
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 19:54:11 -0500
Path:
TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTFEEDS02.phx.gbl!msrtra ns!msrn-in!newshub.sdsu.edu!out03a.usenetserver.com!news.u senetserver.com!in01.usenetserver.com!news.usenets erver.com!in03.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver. com!pc03.usenetserver.com!fe07.usenetserver.com.PO STED!fc3ba190!not-for-mail
Xref: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware:324079

On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 21:53:28 -0400, "JohnO"
<johno@!NOOSPAM!heathkit.com> wrote:

>> I post through a news server that strips headers and IP
>> addresses, and what I post is the truth whether you like it or not.
>
>A troll, a coward, and a liar all at the same time.
>
Nope. Not a coward or a liar. My news provider strips my headers and
IP, not me. Further, not a liar either - I post the TRUTH which none
of you wants to hear.

A troll - depends on the viewpoint. To me, YOU are the troll
disputing the truth of MY posts - that they don't belong on THIS
board.

On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 21:35:32 -0500, "Brian A."
<gonefish'n@afarawaylake> wrote:

>"Farad'n" <none@none.net> wrote in message
>news:atriv3t01g3baqu45senu93sccrnjjjdq9@4ax.com.. .
>>
>> Australian? I'm not from Australia. Or maybe I am. It doesn't
>> matter. I post through a news server that strips headers and IP
>> addresses, and what I post is the truth whether you like it or not.
>
> San Diego State University and Global Crossing in Pheonix Arizona have both
>been notified.

And that matters how? I'm from neither - or maybe I am. What
difference does it make? I'm only pointing out the TRUTH, which you
trolls and dumbasses don't like to hear.

"New Orleans Novice" <ReadingLearningWriting@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:uEVR$TLmIHA.5280@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>I have your previous reply saved. If I buy a new RIG maybe it will have
>PCI X and / or SCSI.
>
> This PC only has PCI and 2 IDE channels on the MB so on a test the 2nd
> DATA cable will be removed from the CDROM and connected to a 2nd HD used
> for DATA only just to test if it will work and boot up.
>
> Someone sent this link which was very informative;
> Sent by PAUL:
> This is a long read, but you'll be a better person if you finish it.
>
> http://www.pcguide.com/ref/hdd/if/ide/conf.htm
>
> The best data cables, are the ones with 80 wires (thinner wire).
>

Irregardless the gauge of the wire, the 2nd set of 40 wires are for
grounding out reflections on the active side of the other 40 wires for the
80 wire versions of IDE/ATA ribbon cable. By reflections, I mean the pulsed
data that may be felt on an adjacent wire or wires creating false/bad data.
I didn't read it as am familiar with IDE/ATA. Hopefully, you never meet the
old WD and Maxtor monster.
--
Dave

Hi Farah Farad,

That is a girl's name so you need to move over to other forums like; Washing
Dishes or Mopping Floors.

When you are in New Orleans call me so I can take you Alligator hunting in
the Louisiana swamps.

Be careful and don't fall in the water.