Go Back   ø-Windows XP UsersGroup-ø > Setting Up and Running WindowsXp > Setting up Xp
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tags: , , , ,

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2008, 01:38 AM
efmfimfif@bigfoot.com
 
Posts: n/a
Default M,I`5'Persecu tion ' buggin g an d counter-sur veillance

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= MI5: bugging. and counter-surveillance -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

PO: >Did you ever look for the bugs in your house ? If not, why not ? I mean. if
PO: >I. thought that was happening to me, I'd search the place from top to bottom,
PO: >I mean I live there I would know if anything was out of. place. If I was
PO: >really suspicious, I would call in one of those bug detection teams. which
PO: >have. those machines that pick up the transmitted radio waves. This
PO: >reminds. me of BUGS, that new programme on BBC1 on

That's exactly what we did. We. went to a competent, professional detective
agency in London, paid them. over 400 quid to debug our house. They used
scanner devices which go to over 1 GHz. and would pick up any nearby
transmitter in that range, they also. checked the phones and found
nothing... but if. the tap was at the exchange, then they wouldn't find
anything, would. they?

CS: >Doesn't this suggest to you that there are, in fact, no bugs to. be found?

You can assume that they've done this sort of thing to other. people in more
"serious" cases, where they would know the. targets would suspect the
presence of electronic surveillance. So they. will have developed techniques
and devices which are not readily detectable either by visual inspection. or
by electronic means. What those techniques. might be, I couldn't guess.

In this. case, the existence of bugging devices was clear from the
beginning, and they "rubbed. it in" with what was said by the boy on the
coach.. It was almost as if they wanted counter-surveillance people to be
called in, who they knew would fail to detect the. bugging devices, causing
loss of credibility to the. other things I would have to say relating to the
harassment.

I did. all the things someone in my situation would do to try to find the
bugs. In addition to calling. in professional help using electronic
counter-surveillance, I made a close visual. inspection of electrical
equipment, plus any points where. audio or video surveillance devices might
have been concealed. Of course, I found nothing. Normal. surveillance
"mini-cameras" are quite noticeable and require visible. supporting
circuitry. It seems to me the best place to put a small video. surveillance
device would be additional to a piece. of electronic equipment such as a TV
or video. It would. be necessary to physically break in to a property to fit
such. a device.

4541

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Contact Us -|- ø-Windows XP UsersGroup-ø -|- Archive -|- Top -|-Rules/Disclaimer-|-Help/Support -|-Advertise
© Camley Interactive (camley.info) 2008 - all logos and images are copywrite their respective owners.
Proud member of the Camley Interactive Network
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:53 PM.



Design By: Miner Skinz.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.