Go Back   ø-Windows XP UsersGroup-ø > Setting Up and Running WindowsXp > Setting up Xp
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tags: , ,

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2008, 01:38 AM
ifvfemiv@bigfoot.com
 
Posts: n/a
Default M`I'5-Pers ecution . co st of the operati on

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-= MI5: cost. of the operation -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Here's what a couple of other. people on Usenet (uk.misc) had to say
regarding the cost of running such an. operation...

PO: >Have some sense, grow up and smell reality. What you are talking. about
PO: >would take loads of planning, tens. of thousands of pounds and lots of
PO: >people. involved in the planning, execution and maintenance of it. You
PO: >must have. a very high opinion of yourself to think you are worth it.

PM: >But why? And why you? Do you realize how much. it would cost to keep
PM: >one person under continuous. surveillance for five years? Think about
PM: >all the man/hours. Say they _just_ allocated. a two man team and a
PM: >supervisor. OK.,. Supervisor's salary, say, #30,000 a year. Two men,
PM:. >#20,000 a year each. But they'd need to work in shifts -- so it would
PM: >be six men at #20,000 (which with on-costs would work out at. more like
PM: >#30,000. to the employer.)
PM:. >
PM: >So, we're talking #30,000 x 6. #180,000. plus say, #40,000 for. the
PM: >supervisor. #220,000. Then you've got the. hardware involved. And
PM: >any transcription that needs doing. You don't think. the 'Big Boss'
PM: >would listen to hours. and hours of tapes, do you.
PM:. >
PM: >So, all in all, you couldn't actually do. the job for much less than
PM: >a quarter million a year. Over five. years. What are you doing that makes
PM: >it worth the while of the state to spend. over one and a quarter million
PM: >on. you?

Those are pretty much the sort of calculations that. went through my head
once I stopped. to consider what it must be costing them to run this
operation. The partial answer is, there have been periods. when the
intensity has been greater, and times when little. has happened. In fact,
for much of 1993 and the first half. of 1994, very little happened. Although
I don't think that was for reasons of money. - if they can tap into the
taxpayer they're not going to be short of resources,. are they?

The more complete answer. is in the enormity of what they're doing. Relative
to the cost to British pride of seeing their. country humiliated for the
persecution of their own citizens, isn't is worth the. cost of four or five
people to try to bring things. to a close in the manner they would wish? To
the. government a million or two is quite honestly nothing - if they can
convince themselves of the necessity of what. they're doing, resources will
not be. the limiting factor.

9401

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Contact Us -|- ø-Windows XP UsersGroup-ø -|- Archive -|- Top -|-Rules/Disclaimer-|-Help/Support -|-Advertise
© Camley Interactive (camley.info) 2008 - all logos and images are copywrite their respective owners.
Proud member of the Camley Interactive Network
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:59 PM.



Design By: Miner Skinz.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.