![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Tags: fixes, microsoft, old, updates |
![]() |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes | ![]() |
|
|||
|
All these folders (NtUninstallKBxxxxxx$) and associated files in these
folders are safe to remove, however once deleted you will no longer be able to un-install a patch or update that was associated with the deleted folder/files. I would keep the most recent set (last two months just in case) of folders and delete the older updates. As a safety net I burned these folders to a CD before deleting them. Warning: One folder you should not delete is: $hf_mig$ Also See Doug Knox's page on this issue: http://www.dougknox.com/xp/utils/xp_hotfix_backup.htm JS "JHRooney" <JHRooney@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:E76AB37A-B8DA-4BDC-BF54-C19510DC6C3E@microsoft.com... >I have updates dating back to 2002 on my computer. How can I tell if they >are > replace with later updates and hot fixes? I need to free up some harddrive > space. |
|
|||
|
On Thu, 1 May 2008 14:36:47 -0400, "JS" <@> wrote:
> All these folders (NtUninstallKBxxxxxx$) and associated files in these > folders are safe to remove, > however once deleted you will no longer be able to un-install a patch or > update that was associated with the deleted folder/files. > I would keep the most recent set (last two months just in case) of folders > and delete the older updates. > As a safety net I burned these folders to a CD before deleting them. > > Warning: One folder you should not delete is: $hf_mig$ > > Also See Doug Knox's page on this issue: > http://www.dougknox.com/xp/utils/xp_hotfix_backup.htm Addressing JHRooney, I'll just add to the above that if you are so short on hard drive space that the small amount that those update uninstall files take is significant, this will only be a stopgap measure. Your only real solution is to buy another larger drive. > "JHRooney" <JHRooney@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:E76AB37A-B8DA-4BDC-BF54-C19510DC6C3E@microsoft.com... > >I have updates dating back to 2002 on my computer. How can I tell if they > >are > > replace with later updates and hot fixes? I need to free up some harddrive > > space. > -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
|
|||
|
Ken,
Something is strange with this machine. It has windows XP Basic, with media player, no additional programs, not even Adobe acrobat. All email, system restore points, purged. Disk cleanup and defrag run many times. Only fragmented file is 562M/bit in Doc and settings. Hard drive capacity is 5.58G/bit with 73% used. Their has to be something within Windows that keeps using up harddrive capacity as a function of time. Virus scan is Avasti using 60 m/b. This includes fiel back up data base. I think wind XP Basic should not occupy over 1.5G/bit max. Thanks for the response though. "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote: > On Thu, 1 May 2008 14:36:47 -0400, "JS" <@> wrote: > > > All these folders (NtUninstallKBxxxxxx$) and associated files in these > > folders are safe to remove, > > however once deleted you will no longer be able to un-install a patch or > > update that was associated with the deleted folder/files. > > I would keep the most recent set (last two months just in case) of folders > > and delete the older updates. > > As a safety net I burned these folders to a CD before deleting them. > > > > Warning: One folder you should not delete is: $hf_mig$ > > > > Also See Doug Knox's page on this issue: > > http://www.dougknox.com/xp/utils/xp_hotfix_backup.htm > > > Addressing JHRooney, I'll just add to the above that if you are so > short on hard drive space that the small amount that those update > uninstall files take is significant, this will only be a stopgap > measure. Your only real solution is to buy another larger drive. > > > > > > "JHRooney" <JHRooney@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > news:E76AB37A-B8DA-4BDC-BF54-C19510DC6C3E@microsoft.com... > > >I have updates dating back to 2002 on my computer. How can I tell if they > > >are > > > replace with later updates and hot fixes? I need to free up some harddrive > > > space. > > > > -- > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience > Please Reply to the Newsgroup > |
|
|||
|
"JHRooney" <JHRooney@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:15F937C3-477F-4268-930F-2B066BBE17FC@microsoft.com... > Ken, > Something is strange with this machine. It has windows XP Basic, with > media > player, no additional programs, not even Adobe acrobat. All email, system > restore points, purged. Disk cleanup and defrag run many times. Only > fragmented file is 562M/bit in Doc and settings. Hard drive capacity is > 5.58G/bit with 73% used. Their has to be something within Windows that > keeps > using up harddrive capacity as a function of time. Virus scan is Avasti > using > 60 m/b. This includes fiel back up data base. I think wind XP Basic should > not occupy over 1.5G/bit max. Thanks for the response though. > > "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote: > >> On Thu, 1 May 2008 14:36:47 -0400, "JS" <@> wrote: >> >> > All these folders (NtUninstallKBxxxxxx$) and associated files in these >> > folders are safe to remove, >> > however once deleted you will no longer be able to un-install a patch >> > or >> > update that was associated with the deleted folder/files. >> > I would keep the most recent set (last two months just in case) of >> > folders >> > and delete the older updates. >> > As a safety net I burned these folders to a CD before deleting them. >> > >> > Warning: One folder you should not delete is: $hf_mig$ >> > >> > Also See Doug Knox's page on this issue: >> > http://www.dougknox.com/xp/utils/xp_hotfix_backup.htm >> >> >> Addressing JHRooney, I'll just add to the above that if you are so >> short on hard drive space that the small amount that those update >> uninstall files take is significant, this will only be a stopgap >> measure. Your only real solution is to buy another larger drive. >> >> >> >> >> > "JHRooney" <JHRooney@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> > news:E76AB37A-B8DA-4BDC-BF54-C19510DC6C3E@microsoft.com... >> > >I have updates dating back to 2002 on my computer. How can I tell if >> > >they >> > >are >> > > replace with later updates and hot fixes? I need to free up some >> > > harddrive >> > > space. >> > >> >> -- >> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience >> Please Reply to the Newsgroup >> As Ken said, your hard drive is too small. In point of fact, your disk drive could not possibly contain my system. But, of course, you can still keep using the drive if you do the things that you mention. However, you will find no reduction of disk space by defragmenting your drive. You may see an improvement in performance (this all depends on what you are doing). For me, though, I would rather spend my time in using the computer as opposed to continually shrinking the size on disk. I got my fill of that in trying to get VAX/VMS to fit on a very small disk. Jim |
|
|||
|
What is the make and model of your PC, the size of your hard drive, how much
memory (ram) is installed and when (what year) did you purchase it? What version of XP do you have installed? Is it 1) XP Home, 2) XP Pro, 3) XP Media Edition. JS "JHRooney" <JHRooney@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:15F937C3-477F-4268-930F-2B066BBE17FC@microsoft.com... > Ken, > Something is strange with this machine. It has windows XP Basic, with > media > player, no additional programs, not even Adobe acrobat. All email, system > restore points, purged. Disk cleanup and defrag run many times. Only > fragmented file is 562M/bit in Doc and settings. Hard drive capacity is > 5.58G/bit with 73% used. Their has to be something within Windows that > keeps > using up harddrive capacity as a function of time. Virus scan is Avasti > using > 60 m/b. This includes fiel back up data base. I think wind XP Basic should > not occupy over 1.5G/bit max. Thanks for the response though. > > "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote: > >> On Thu, 1 May 2008 14:36:47 -0400, "JS" <@> wrote: >> >> > All these folders (NtUninstallKBxxxxxx$) and associated files in these >> > folders are safe to remove, >> > however once deleted you will no longer be able to un-install a patch >> > or >> > update that was associated with the deleted folder/files. >> > I would keep the most recent set (last two months just in case) of >> > folders >> > and delete the older updates. >> > As a safety net I burned these folders to a CD before deleting them. >> > >> > Warning: One folder you should not delete is: $hf_mig$ >> > >> > Also See Doug Knox's page on this issue: >> > http://www.dougknox.com/xp/utils/xp_hotfix_backup.htm >> >> >> Addressing JHRooney, I'll just add to the above that if you are so >> short on hard drive space that the small amount that those update >> uninstall files take is significant, this will only be a stopgap >> measure. Your only real solution is to buy another larger drive. >> >> >> >> >> > "JHRooney" <JHRooney@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> > news:E76AB37A-B8DA-4BDC-BF54-C19510DC6C3E@microsoft.com... >> > >I have updates dating back to 2002 on my computer. How can I tell if >> > >they >> > >are >> > > replace with later updates and hot fixes? I need to free up some >> > > harddrive >> > > space. >> > >> >> -- >> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience >> Please Reply to the Newsgroup >> |
|
|||
|
On Thu, 1 May 2008 19:38:02 -0700, JHRooney
<JHRooney@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > Ken, > Something is strange with this machine. It has windows XP Basic, with media > player, no additional programs, not even Adobe acrobat. All email, system > restore points, purged. Disk cleanup and defrag run many times. Only > fragmented file is 562M/bit in Doc and settings. Hard drive capacity is > 5.58G/bit with 73% used. Their has to be something within Windows that keeps > using up harddrive capacity as a function of time. Virus scan is Avasti using > 60 m/b. This includes fiel back up data base. I think wind XP Basic should > not occupy over 1.5G/bit max. Thanks for the response though. First, note that when say "G/bit," you presumably mean Giga*bytes*. A 5.58 gigabit drive would not hold Windows XP. Second, there are uses of the drive you presuambly aren't aware of, such as space for System Restore Points, the hibernation file, and the Recycle bin. Using up 73% of 6GB (about 4.5GB) is not only not unusual, but is actually extremely little. There is nothing wrong within Windows, and no indication that there is a virus problem. As I said earlier, you badly need to buy another, larger drive. Your present drive is so small as to be almost useless. I wouldn't even recommed keeping it as a second drive. If you shop around on the internet, you can buy a 160GB drive for as little as $50 or so. > "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote: > > > On Thu, 1 May 2008 14:36:47 -0400, "JS" <@> wrote: > > > > > All these folders (NtUninstallKBxxxxxx$) and associated files in these > > > folders are safe to remove, > > > however once deleted you will no longer be able to un-install a patch or > > > update that was associated with the deleted folder/files. > > > I would keep the most recent set (last two months just in case) of folders > > > and delete the older updates. > > > As a safety net I burned these folders to a CD before deleting them. > > > > > > Warning: One folder you should not delete is: $hf_mig$ > > > > > > Also See Doug Knox's page on this issue: > > > http://www.dougknox.com/xp/utils/xp_hotfix_backup.htm > > > > > > Addressing JHRooney, I'll just add to the above that if you are so > > short on hard drive space that the small amount that those update > > uninstall files take is significant, this will only be a stopgap > > measure. Your only real solution is to buy another larger drive. > > > > > > > > > > > "JHRooney" <JHRooney@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > > news:E76AB37A-B8DA-4BDC-BF54-C19510DC6C3E@microsoft.com... > > > >I have updates dating back to 2002 on my computer. How can I tell if they > > > >are > > > > replace with later updates and hot fixes? I need to free up some harddrive > > > > space. > > > > > > > -- > > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience > > Please Reply to the Newsgroup > > -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
|
|||
|
> I have updates dating back to 2002 on my computer. How can I tell if
> they are replace with later updates and hot fixes? I need to free up > some harddrive space. It's safe to delete them all, assuming you will never want to remove any of them. But, it won't gain you any substantial disk space. You need better alternatives, the best being another hard drive. |
|
|||
|
Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
<snip> > First, note that when say "G/bit," you presumably mean Giga*bytes*. > A 5.58 gigabit drive would not hold Windows XP. <snip> Ken, Actually... I believe you could get Windows XP and quite a bit more on a 5.58GB drive. I currently have a Virtual Box machine with the following installed: - 7-Zip 4.57 - Adobe Flash Player ActiveX - Adobe Flash Player Plugin - Adobe Shockwave Player 11 - Alt-Tab Task Switcher Powertoy for Windows XP - AVG Free 8.0 - CmdHere Powertoy For Windows XP - Foxit Reader - ImgBurn - Java(TM) 6 Update 6 - Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 - Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 - Microsoft Compression Client Pack 1.0 for Windows XP - Microsoft Silverlight - Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable - Mozilla Firefox (2.0.0.14) - Mozilla Thunderbird (2.0.0.12) - OpenOffice.org 2.4 - Paint.NET v3.30 - PDFCreator - QuickTime - Real Alternative 1.8.0 - Shockwave Director 11.0 - Tweak UI - Windows Internet Explorer 7 - Windows Media Player 11 It takes up a total of 3.95 GB (4,250,427,392 bytes) of space. While I don't recommend doing that (in fact - quite the opposite) - I do know that the amount of space that could be taken up by a basic Windows XP Professional install and the basic tools some users might utilize daily should take up about 4GB of space. However - I do recommend 15+GB for the system drive (25+GB really, 40+GB even better) as users will likely be storing their stuff on the machines as they utilize it. ;-) -- Shenan Stanley MS-MVP -- How To Ask Questions The Smart Way http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html |
|
|||
|
On Sun, 4 May 2008 22:36:18 -0500, "Shenan Stanley"
<newshelper@gmail.com> wrote: > Ken Blake, MVP wrote: > <snip> > > First, note that when say "G/bit," you presumably mean Giga*bytes*. > > A 5.58 gigabit drive would not hold Windows XP. > <snip> > > Ken, > > Actually... I believe you could get Windows XP and quite a bit more on a > 5.58GB drive. Sure. I agree, but I didn't say otherwise. Please reread what I said: "A 5.58 gigabit drive would not hold Windows XP." Note that I said "gigabit" (which is what he mistakenly said), not "gigabyte." 5.58 gigabits is about .7 gigabytes. That was the whole point of my paragraph you quoted above. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:08 AM. |